It looks Anna was the latest youngest from the lady siblings – Anna was just 5 when her mommy died online hookup Anaheim and 17 whenever her father passed away.
JOHN
Mothers John Porter regarding Tapenhall (1560-1625); guy from Thomas Porter Anne marie CALVERT Sybil VESSEY (1561-1625); girl away from Thomas Vessey Elizabeth Chapel
John Porter’s range are reported going completely upwards towards Norman Knight, William de la Grande who battled in conjunction with William the latest Conqueror for the 1066, on Battle regarding Hastings.
- Francis Porter (1585-1635); Spouses: Joan DRAPER, Joan SMITH
- Margaret PORTER Nash (1587-1628); Spouse: ______ Nash
- Frances PORTER (1588-1635); Spouse: John Draper
- Thomas Porter II (1590-1638) – they are an effective II? Having I?
- William Porter (1596-1635)
- Sophistication Ann PORTER (abt 1598-1659); Spouse: William Judson Jr
- Flower PORTER (1598-1635); Spouse: ___ Wentworth
- John Porter (from Narragansett) (1605-1674); < . – Come across lower than “Maybe not the Colonial Man”
Hmm. Did they really has actually a masculine Francis and you can a lady Frances who each other parece try equivalent (Joan – John)? Stranger everything has took place, but this is going to make me inquire and needs lookup.
Where around the globe?
To possess a concept of proximity, Felsted and Fooling are about fourteen miles from one another, while Shalford is roughly 6 kilometers north and you will somewhat eastern regarding Felsted.
Maybe not Our COLONIAL Son…
Our John Porter shouldn’t be confused with another John Porter exactly who arrived in The brand new The united kingdomt into the 1633. That John Porter is a signer of your Portsmouth Compact in the what became new Nest of Rhode Island, lived in Boston and you may is one of many modern buyers out-of new Pettaquamscutt countries (afterwards Southern Kingstown, Rhode Area). The guy spotted conflict and you may courtroom to possess deserting his girlfriend later on from inside the lifestyle and you may taking on with the previous common-legislation girlfriend out of an upstanding person in the community. It is not our very own man. But, brand new Geni page for wife deserter John (aka John Porter away from Narragansett) states that he is a cousin to our John – two sibling Johns from the family unit members? Hmmm. I’ve gotta say, I am not saying sure. I might look into it later, although not now.
Neither would be to all of our John become mistaken for the brand new a number of John Porter’s exactly who starred in Virginia from the 1642, however they are most likely related, since there is good evidence these were originated of Edmund Porter off Tapenhall. This family line including goes wrong with allege two cousin Johns from inside the an equivalent nearest and dearest. Are this family unit members incapable of considering right up boys brands? lol.
An alternative John Porter never to getting confused with ours are John Porter Sr., an excellent , MA right after which relocating to Salem, in which he had been the new patriarch of your wealthiest friends on city. So it John Porter is found on a list of People of the fresh new Salem Witch Examples according to the sub classification “maybe not indicted”.
John Porter-Anna White Marriage
John Porter and you can Anna Light have been hitched 18 October 1620 at the The New orleans saints Church in the Fooling, Essex, England as per Fooling Parish records.
Note: I’ve seen one records one incorporated a primary girlfriend for John, claiming the guy hitched an effective Margaret Odding when you look at the 1606 at Madron, Cornwall, England, where she passed away within the 1671. not, the John would have merely started twelve in the course of it wedding; A simple look suggests that Margaret Odding partnered that almost every other John Porter (in the list above) – I’m sure, I’m sure – one John would have only already been regarding the a year old depending with the dates provided – however, he isn’t my John, and so i will not be digging into the that it, however if he or she is your, then you certainly is to!
Leave a reply