Preliminary analyses
For short-name partner poaching, 48 boys (forty-five.7% of men) and you may fifty women (38.5% of women) expressed at the least certain experience in companion poaching (we.age., obtained 0). For long-term companion poaching, twenty-four males (22.8% of males) and you may forty two lady (33.8% of females) indicated no less than certain experience in partner poaching (we.elizabeth., scored 0). 2%) and you will 44 girls (33.8%) shown at least specific experience with partner poaching (we.age., scored 0).
Anyone didn’t differ in their profile out-of mate poaching efforts otherwise the profits on partner poaching (short-title poaching sample: t (233) = 0.91, p = .366; long-identity poaching shot: t (233) = -step 1.385, p = .167; private matchmaking poaching shot: t (233) = .022, p = .983; short-name poaching triumph: t (96) = -step 1.fifty, p = .137, long-label poaching achievements t (66) = 0.50, p = .618; the newest matchmaking poaching https://datingranking.net/es/citas-bautistas/ achievement: t (80) = -0.545, p = .587.
Number 1 analyses
We basic computed this new correlations among identification parameters, spouse poaching initiatives, and you will companion poaching achievements for each and every intercourse. Once aga...
Read More